Change triggers
Change Management:New book few sample pages-free read
Lehman
Story -Financial services industry -USA
World witnessed the unexpected resilience and recovery of Lehman Brothers only to anguish over
the collapse . Lehman's culture was one of conservative management yet it could rapidly adapt and
change when crisis hit them .The same agile
leadership and culture could not ensure survival when
confronted with another
challenge to resurrect . The difference in both situations was that in the
second time the crisis was driven by greed of the leadership that was hidden and not visible . The
organization which displayed extraordinary agility to adapt had
demonstrated another ugly side that
not only destroyed them but killed many
allies who trusted them and were totally unprepared for the
sudden change of
events and challenges.
Three floors of World Trade Center in
Manhattan, Newyork were in the pride possessions of
Lehman brothers. They would never have anticipated that their prestigious possession would
crumble and come down one day
and would later become an object of ridicule .
When the jet planes rammed into the world trade towers, few employees were among those who
lost life.
The biggest financial center got destroyed and was rendered useless so also the office of
Lehman. Lehman
management had to think and act quickly to keep the business going . The task
included relocating over 6,500 employees. The crisis upset everything upside down for
the employees who were used
to operating from plush air conditioned offices and high power
trading floors .They had to move to makeshift offices in rented
office space at Sheraton Hotel.
Many employees had no option but to
work from home which they never had done before.
Business
recovery had to be rapid and quick hence the trading operations were moved to a
makeshift offices in Jersey City, New Jersey.
Makeshift trading floor were set up in a
hotel in less
than forty-eight hours after the collapse . When stock markets reopened on September 17, 2001,
Lehman's sales and trading
capabilities were operational in full swing.
This demonstrated adaptive capability
to dramatic changes even when the situation was thrust upon
them
suddenly by external uncontrollable factors.
An employee said "My friends from Stanford, who always knew me as
the least technical person in
the world, couldn’t imagine myself fixing
computer issues. I did this for about a month, until I got
assigned to a M&A. deal, which
kept me, working 24/7 for seven months” This is a fine example of
collective
responsibility in dealing with crisis in pure HR language this is the evidence
of engaged
employees who are loyal and committed.
Yet, the same company on September 15, 2008 had
to take most painful and tragic step of filing
bankruptcy which was driven
mainly by internal forces of misdeeds. The epicenter of
the main
financial earthquake at New York City in the USA spread the shock
waves and caused the financial
tsunami and the impact was felt simultaneously
all over the world. The Lehman collapse triggered a
lot of change in the
financial services sector in the USA in particular and broadly all over the
world
compelling Government and regulatory authorities to bring sweeping changes
to protect investors’
interest.
With infliction of the biggest loss to the investors and loss of trust in markets around the world
Lehman could never have recovered. When collapse was imminent , Lehman had accumulated
debt of $619 billion, rendering the bankruptcy the largest of its
kind in the history of Wall Street.
Lehman was the fourth-largest U.S.
investment bank at the time of its collapse and this collapse also
was the
largest victim, of the U.S. subprime mortgage. This crisis like a tornado swept through
entire global financial
markets and the event greatly intensified the 2008 crisis. It contributed to
the
erosion of about $10 trillion in market capitalization from global equity
markets making it the
biggest ever decline of the time. The organization which
came out of one disaster successfully was
the center of another crisis all over
the world. While successfully coping with one external crisis, it
was unable to
come out of another internal crisis. Surprisingly the engaged and loyal
employees of one time did not feel it legitimate to stand with the top management that
engineered
this downfall.
....Lesson from this event have been learnt . The outcome for the institutions was in the form of
changes in regulatory and compliance standards.
Comments
Post a Comment